HomeStructural BiologyCryo-Electron Microscopy
Structural Biology Services

Cryo-Electron Microscopy
CryoEM-SPA

CryoEM single particle analysis (SPA) uses the electron scattering mechanism combined with cryogenic freezing, which significantly reduces high-energy electron beam damage to molecular structures, enabling near-native high-resolution structure determination of proteins without crystallization.

✓
Rapid cryogenic sample preparation maintains near-native hydrated state of the sample
✓
Enables detection of multiple conformational states of the same target protein
✓
No crystallization required — capable of resolving difficult membrane proteins
✓
Suitable for determining structures of large protein complexes and assemblies
✓
Microgram-level sample requirements with high tolerance for protein purity variation
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein — cryo-EM structure (PDB: 6VXX)
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein · Cryo-EM · PDB: 6VXX
2.5 Å
Best Resolution Achieved
300 kV
Titan Krios Instrument
≤1 Month
Fastest Delivery
0
Crystals Needed
5+
Conformational States / Dataset
Service Advantages

Why Choose ICDMO Cryo-EM Services

Fastest Delivery
Delivery
Speed

Fastest Delivery — Within 1 Month

ICDMO has assembled a multidisciplinary cryo-EM expert team covering sample preparation, grid optimization, data collection, and structure determination. We provide fully customized one-stop service, with rapid turnaround possible within 1 month for well-behaved samples.

Leading Platform
Platform
Equipment

Leading Electron Microscopy Platform

ICDMO arranges data collection on cutting-edge cryo-electron microscopes through partner facilities — including 300 kV Titan Krios with Falcon 4 detector and energy filter, and 200 kV Glacios instruments for rapid screening — matched to your resolution goals. Map processing, model building and structural interpretation are done by our own computational team.

Cost Performance
Value
Value

Superior Service at Competitive Pricing

ICDMO delivers above-industry service content — from negative stain pre-screening through PDB deposition and manuscript support — at highly competitive pricing. Every project includes a free feasibility assessment and scientific consultation at no additional cost.

Experimental Workflow

From Sample Submission to Atomic Structure

A systematic eight-stage quality-controlled pipeline covering every step from sample receipt through PDB deposition and final report delivery.

SPA Workflow Overview
Single-Particle Cryo-EM Workflow — NIH/PMC
Source: A Primer to Single-Particle Cryo-EM, Cell 2015 · NIH PMC4409659

How Single-Particle Analysis Works

In cryo-EM SPA, tens of thousands of 2D projection images of individual protein particles are collected, computationally aligned, and averaged to reconstruct a high-resolution 3D density map. Unlike crystallography, no ordered crystal is needed — particles are imaged in their near-native hydrated state embedded in vitrified ice.

The process begins with negative-stain TEM for rapid quality assessment, followed by cryo-sample preparation and high-resolution data collection on a 300 kV FEG instrument. Data processing produces density maps with resolution assessed by gold-standard Fourier shell correlation, into which atomic models are then built and refined.

A key advantage is the ability to capture multiple conformational states within a single experiment — 3D classification separates heterogeneous particle populations into distinct structural states, providing a dynamic view of protein function that is inaccessible to crystallography.

01

Sample Preparation

The client provides purified protein samples directly, or specifies the target protein sequence for ICDMO to arrange expression and purification through partner laboratories. Sample purity, concentration, and buffer conditions are assessed and confirmed before proceeding to the next stage.

02

Negative Stain TEM

Heavy metal staining (uranyl acetate or uranyl formate) is applied for rapid quality assessment. Micrographs are analyzed to evaluate particle homogeneity, dispersity, size, shape, and sample concentration — providing a fast go/no-go decision before cryo-sample preparation.

03

Cryo-Sample Preparation

Using a Vitrobot Mark IV plunge-freezer, 3–5 µL of protein sample is applied to a glow-discharged grid. The sample is blotted to form a thin molecular layer and rapidly plunged into liquid ethane (−185°C), vitrifying the sample in amorphous ice to preserve the native protein structure and spatial distribution.

04

Sample Screening & Preliminary Data Collection

Grids are screened using a 200 kV FEG microscope to assess ice thickness, particle distribution, preferred orientation, and 2D class average quality. Preliminary data collection provides resolution estimates and guides optimization of grid conditions before high-resolution acquisition.

05

High-Resolution Data Acquisition

High-resolution data is collected on a 300 kV FEG cryo-electron microscope (Titan Krios) equipped with a direct electron detector (Falcon 4 or K3). Automated acquisition software (EPU, SerialEM) collects tens of thousands to millions of single-particle micrographs with high-throughput automation.

06

Data Processing & 3D Reconstruction

Raw micrograph movies are processed through a multi-step pipeline: beam-induced motion correction, contrast transfer function estimation, automated particle picking, two- and three-dimensional classification, ab initio reconstruction and iterative refinement. Resolution is tracked by gold-standard Fourier shell correlation throughout, and terabyte-scale datasets are handled on dedicated compute.

07

Atomic Model Building

The refined density map is used for atomic model building, with predicted or homologous starting models fitted into density and rebuilt where the map supports it, followed by real-space refinement. Model geometry and fit to density are validated against deposition-standard criteria, and regions not supported by the map are reported as unmodelled rather than filled in.

08

Structure Analysis & Report Delivery

The final atomic structure is analyzed for biological insights: binding interfaces, conformational changes, potential drug-binding pockets, and mechanistic interpretation. A comprehensive project report is delivered including the density map, atomic coordinates, local resolution maps, Fourier shell correlation curves and publication-quality figures.

Representative Case

MRGPRX2 Complex

Cryo-EM protein structure
β-Galactosidase tetramer · 2.2 Å · PDB: 5A1A
GPCR ComplexCryo-EM SPASkin Mast Cell

MRGPRX2 – G Protein-Coupled Receptor Complex

MRGPRX2 (Mas-Related G Protein-Coupled Receptor X2) is a GPCR primarily expressed in skin mast cells. It is mainly involved in non-IgE-dependent mast cell activation, playing a key role in Type VII hypersensitivity reactions and pseudo-allergic drug responses.

Using cryo-EM single particle analysis, ICDMO determined the near-atomic resolution structure of the MRGPRX2 complex with its G protein partner. The structure revealed the transmembrane helix packing geometry, key ligand-binding residues in the orthosteric pocket, and a cryptic allosteric site — providing the molecular basis for mast cell activation and a structural template for drug safety profiling and therapeutic development.

Target Class
GPCR (Class A)
Method
CryoEM-SPA
Resolution
3.2 Å
View More

Services Included

Service ItemDescriptionTurnaround
Negative Stain TEM ScreeningRapid quality check: particle distribution, homogeneity, oligomeric state assessment3–5 days
Cryo-Grid PreparationVitrobot / Leica GP2 vitrification; grid condition and ice thickness optimization1–2 weeks
Low-Resolution Data Collection200 kV screening dataset; 2D class averages; preliminary resolution estimate1–2 weeks
High-Resolution Data Collection300 kV Titan Krios; Falcon 4 or K3 detector; 2,000–10,000+ micrographs2–4 weeks
Single Particle Analysis (SPA)Motion correction, CTF estimation, 2D/3D classification, ab initio reconstruction and refinement2–4 weeks
Heterogeneous Refinement3D variability analysis; conformational landscape from a single dataset1–2 weeks
Atomic Model BuildingAtomic model building, real-space refinement and deposition-standard geometry validation1–2 weeks
Membrane Protein Cryo-EMDetergent, amphipol, or nanodisc reconstitution; optimized for GPCRs / channels6–16 weeks
PDB Deposition & ReportMap and model deposition, written report and publication-quality figures1 week

Frequently Asked Questions

Note: Timelines are estimates for well-behaved samples. Challenging membrane proteins or heterogeneous complexes may require additional optimization. Contact us for a free negative stain pre-screening before committing to full cryo-EM data collection.

Free Pre-Screening Assessment

Submit your sample for a free negative stain TEM screening. We assess particle quality and provide a resolution feasibility estimate before you commit to full cryo-EM data collection.

Contact Us Online Consultation

Standard Deliverables

✓EM density map in standard map format
✓Fitted atomic coordinate PDB file
✓Local resolution & FSC curves
✓2D/3D class average images
✓Full validation report: geometry, clashes and fit to density
✓Publication-quality figures and viewer sessions
✓Full written interpretation report
✓PDB & EMDB deposition assistance

Quick Inquiry

Other Structural Techniques

X-Ray CrystallographyVirtual ScreeningNMR SpectroscopySAXS AnalysisStructure-Based Drug DesignStructural Biology Overview

What We Need From You

▸Sample description: composition, molecular weight, symmetry, expected conformational heterogeneity and purity
▸Raw movies or micrographs where data already exists, with acquisition parameters and detector details
▸Any existing maps, models or homologous structures, including unpublished internal data
▸The scientific question: overall architecture, ligand density, conformational states or interface detail
▸Whether deposition to public databases is planned, since that affects validation and documentation

How the Work Is Performed

▸Motion correction, contrast transfer function estimation and micrograph quality curation
▸Particle picking, two- and three-dimensional classification, and removal of junk and damaged particles
▸Ab initio reconstruction and iterative refinement with resolution tracked by gold-standard correlation
▸Heterogeneity analysis to separate conformational states rather than averaging them together
▸Atomic model building into density, real-space refinement and validation against deposition standards
▸Local resolution estimation and honest annotation of regions the map does not support

What You Receive

▸Density maps in standard format with half-maps and local resolution estimates
▸Fourier shell correlation curves and the full processing record with parameters
▸Fitted atomic coordinates with validation statistics and unmodelled regions identified
▸Class averages and heterogeneity analysis where several states were resolved
▸Publication-quality figures, viewer sessions and deposition support

Interpretation and Limitations

Map quality sets a hard ceiling on interpretation, and no processing recovers information the experiment did not capture. Preferred orientation, air-water interface damage and sample heterogeneity limit achievable resolution and are properties of the sample rather than the software. Regions with weak density are reported as unmodelled instead of built speculatively. Sample preparation, grid screening and data collection are performed by your laboratory or a partner facility.

Questions We Are Asked Before Scoping

Can you process data we already collected?
Yes, and reprocessing frequently improves resolution or resolves conformational states that the original processing averaged together, particularly for older datasets.
What resolution will we get?
It depends on sample behaviour, particle size and symmetry far more than on processing. We give a realistic expectation after seeing initial micrographs rather than a number in advance.
Cryo-EM or crystallography for our target?
Cryo-EM for large, flexible or hard-to-crystallise assemblies; crystallography for smaller, well-behaved proteins where ligand density and higher resolution matter. We advise on your specific target, and sometimes recommend both.

What Published Work Reports

The results below were published by independent groups and are cited to show what these computational approaches have achieved in the literature. They are not ICDMO project results, and outcomes vary substantially between targets, datasets and programmes. We do not promise comparable results for any particular project.

Around three quarters of predicted ligand poses fall within 2 Å

Current deep-learning structure prediction, evaluated on an independent protein–ligand benchmark, placed roughly 76% of ligands within 2 Å of the experimental pose, and reported approximately 80% by coordinate error — a substantial improvement over classical docking baselines on the same set, achieved without supplying a binding site. The corollary matters as much as the headline: roughly a quarter of cases still fall outside that threshold, which is why we report confidence per interface rather than delivering a single model.

Abramson et al., Nature, 2024 ↗

Ready to Determine Your Cryo-EM Structure?

Submit your sample for a free negative stain pre-screening. Our team responds within 24 hours with a resolution feasibility estimate and project plan.

Request a Quote Online Consultation