How We Work Together
Three ways engagements are structured
Computational work is commissioned in a few recognisable ways across the industry. We use whichever fits the question rather than pushing every project into one contract shape, and we will say which one we think suits you — including when that is the smallest of the three.
Defined project
Fixed scope, fixed deliverables, fixed price
The most common arrangement. Scope, methods, deliverables and timeline are fixed in writing after a feasibility review, and the price is agreed before work starts. Suited to a screening campaign, an analysis, a design panel or a structural study — anything with a definable endpoint. Most projects on this site fall between a few working days and eight weeks.
Fits when
▸A single question with a definable answer
▸First engagement with us
▸Budget approved per project
Programme support
Rolling cycles alongside your chemistry or biology team
Computational support delivered as repeating cycles over months rather than as one delivery — design, prioritise, wait for your data, re-analyse, design again. Each cycle has a stated question and success criteria, and every cycle closes by comparing what was predicted against what was measured. This is how structure-based design and multi-round engineering campaigns actually work.
Fits when
▸Hit-to-lead and lead optimisation
▸Multi-round protein or enzyme engineering
▸Teams without in-house computational staff
Retained capacity
Agreed scientist time reserved each month
An agreed amount of scientist time is reserved for you each month and spent on whatever the programme needs, with priorities reset at a regular review. Suited to groups with a steady flow of varied questions that would be inefficient to scope individually. Unused capacity is discussed at review rather than silently consumed.
Fits when
▸Continuous, varied workload
▸Fast turnaround on small questions
▸Long-running partnerships